The competition- Website analysis...
As you remember,
According to
Alexa.com, the website is not the most popular in the World, or even the US.
Since it is not fair to compare one website to all the websites in the world,
to judge the effectives or reach of their website, we compare it to one of
their like-minded competitions, Chevron and British Petroleum. We chose these
two companies since they are both international, multi-million dollars
companies in the same economic sector.
Graph
1: How
popular is ExxonMobil’s website?
How popular is Chevron? |
Engagement
metrics helps us understand how interested a site’s visitors are with the sites
content. Since the bounce rate is the percentage of visits that consists of a
single page view, the fact that this percentage is decreasing in the last three
months is a good sign. At the same time, the fact that this percentage is so
high (almost 1::2) demonstrates that the website has a low retention rate and
needs to improve its ability to retain its visitors, past the first page. The
other two statistics reemphasizes that Exxon website is doing better. It is a
positive thing that their daily page view and time spend on the site have been
increasing, however, again, the fact that these are so long are problem enatic
and worrisome- since Exxon, to really be a leader in petroleum sectors should
seek to be the website of reference, and
not an afterthought.
Youtube
You remember the videos from last time, now let's evaluate the effectivness.
To analyze the outreach of their YouTube website, again, we utilize
Alexa.
Since
the bounce rate is so low that it does not even appear on the website, this is
worrisome. The other two statistics reemphasizes the belief that Exxon’s YouTube
page is not doing well. It is a negative thing that their daily page view is
decreasing. On the other hand, it is positive that the time spend on the site has
been increasing, however, again, the fact that these numbers are so low to
begin with is problematic.
Twitter @exxonmobil
Even though Exxon does not
utilize their Twitter page to engage with their consumers, it is important to
realize that the number of Exxon followers has been steadily increasing. This
has been concluded thanks to the tool, Social Baker. Thus, there is a great
possibility for Exxon to increase its reach- since its Tweets are being
followed by more and more people as demonstrated in the graph below.
Addictomatics
At http://addictomatic.com/topic/exxonmobil, we see the wide variety of ways that people are talking about Exxon Mobil.
ExxonValdez Accident
Twenty-five years ago on March 24, the oil tanker Exxon Valdez slammed into Bligh Reef and spilled more than 11 million gallons of crude oil into the cold, clear waters of Alaska's Prince William Sound -- one of the "last best places" on Earth. The oil charged through Prince William Sound and out into the Gulf of Alaska, damaging more than 1,300 miles of the remote, wild shoreline. 25 years later, the Sound’s coastal ecosystem is permanently damaged. Thousands of gallons of Exxon Valdez oil still pollute the beaches. This oil is still toxic and hurting the ecosystem near the shore. The government considers, as of 2010, only 13 of the 32 monitored wildlife populations, habitats and resource services that were injured in the spill as fully "recovered" or "very likely recovered." Some are still listed today as "not recovering." This includes a pod of orcas, which lost 15 of its 22 members after the spill, and has not produced a calf since. Given only one older female is left, scientists appear certain that this unique pod of orcas will go extinct -- it's just a matter of time. The government conclusion is that "there appears to be no hope for recovery."Addictomatic
According to http://addictomatic.com/topic/ExxonMobil+valdez, you also can find information on Exxon Valdez on Bing News, Google Blog, Truveo Video, Flickr, Twingly Blog, Wordpress.com, and Yahoo Web etc.Ice Rocket/Meltwater
Ice Rocket/Meltwater is an internet based search engine that tranks the daily blog citations of any company entered into the search bar. For our project, we entered both exxon mobil exxon valdez, valdez and valdez spill.
Although not very high, during the anniversary, there was a spike in blog posts mentioning those terms. This is not surprising, since there was a high media presence as well Greenpeace action during this week.
Twitter from IceRocket
With the Twitter results from Ice Rocket, we see that there was a high rate social engagement on the Twitter feeds of various people regarding the Exxon Valdez spill. Although most was a retweeting of the Sierra Club tweet, the fact that this was retweeted is significant. The Sierra Club has over 106,106 followers and when they tweeted “What has the oil industry learned in the 25 yrs. since #Exxon Valdez? Not much”, some of those followers decided to retweets it.Even if this exact tweet was not retweeted many times, a larger number of Tweets were original and addressed the Exxon Valdez incident directly. The mix of individual and institutional tweets demonstrates the variety of US interest in this anniversary.
Valdez spill and Online petition
Exxon and Social Mention
Social Mention was used to evaluate the trend of the power of the company over time. We see that Exxon Mobil mostly has a neutral tone, however its strength did substantially decline around the anniversary of the Exxon Valdez incident .
With these tables, we numerically identify the sentiment, passion and reach of the website and the website visitors. We see a strong dip in strength, passion and reach around the time of the anniversary of the accident. Indeed, the numbers dip from 23% strength to 7% around the anniversary date.
The power of the terms "Exxon Valdez" reached its peak during the anniversary period. Between the Greenpeace activity, the social media flurry from environmental conscience groups such as Sierra Club and the online activity from the petition, it seems like the activity about the spill come from the consumer and environmentally activities, virtually engage side. there was no responsse from the compagny-again demonstrating Exxon's unwillingness to engage with the virtual community.
Today's temperature:
Keywords:
Strength: Likely hood that the brand is being discussed.
Sentiment: Ratio of positive to negative emotions Passion: Measure of likely hood that those talking about your brand, will do it again.
Reach: Number of unique authors mentioning your brand.
Google Trends
Another tool used to analyze the interest over time
into the company and its website is Google insights/trends. With this tool, we
were able to enter various terms and see the interest over time.
According to Google
Insights, worldwide searches for Exxon
Mobil Exxon Valdez spill Exxon Valdez ship peaked in April 2006 and May 2010 last year. For ExxonMobil, most of the searches have come from
international countries, such as Nigeria, Singapore, Qatar and Cameron- the USA
only comes in 5. For Exxon Valdez, the most searches come from USA and more
specifically Anchorage and Washington DC. For the last search terms, the
highest country of interest is the USA. The origin of these searches makes
sense, since the Exxon Valdez spill directly affected Alaska.
Google Blog Search
We also analyzed the content of the blogs that mentioned the keywords of
Exxon and Exxon mobile in order to understand what people were saying about the
company on their blogs. If you only type
in the terms of Exxon Mobil, as the following screenshot demonstrates, we only
see corporate – driven profit focus oriented. However, there is a large number of blogs that are active and pertaining to the Valdez accident.
Recommendations
for Exxon
Before giving
recommendations on how to increase the social media, it is important to
understand the identities of the website visitors. Knowing who is in your
customer base dis essential to forming a concrete and thoughtful groundswell
engagement plan.
To establish the identity of their virtual base, we
use Alexa Insights to determine the characteristics.
Thanks to these
analysis, and the insight from the original article, we can establish three
types of visitors to the Exxon Mobil corporate website; investors, journalist
and prospective employers. There are generally well educated people, who are
browsing from their work location (Source; Alexa)
With the background of this research, we establish a three pronged approach to improve the groundswell engagement from Exxon Mobile
a.
Advertise the CSR actions via the web
ExxonMobil is extremely generous in their CSR actions
and donations. This positive action could be enhanced and contribute to the
positive feeling surrounding their brand. By associating their brand to a
positive image ( helping fight malaria in Africa or teaching low- income
American children math and science), the company can slowly peel themselves
away from the negative image that the term ‘multinational corporations’ brings
to mind. Again, the companies already have, by default, a tremendous potential
influence since they are located in over 40 different countries around the
worlds. If they used this reach for social media engaging, it would have an
amazing, dramatic and visible effect.
b.
Career
page
According to the
Career platform page of ExxonMobil, the company is « ExxonMobil is a dynamic,
exciting place to work. We hire exceptional people, and every one of them is
empowered to think independently, take initiative and be innovative.” Among
further investigation of the board of directors we see a staff is on the older
side of spectrum. It is always important to recruit the newest talent-
especially since our generation is the one that is the most intouch with the
social media tools, those tools which Exxon Public Relations department is
clearly lacking. By having a Facebook page for recruitment purposes, where
there would be constant two-way communication, Exxon would have a higher chance
of really recruiting a talented and ethnically diverse workforce.
c.
Exxon
Valdez Response
Finally, the lack of groundswell engagement is
problematic and should be remedied. The lack of consumer engagement and
response is perhaps explained with the fact that the company is so old and is
currently being run by an older generation. The fact is that the company’s only response
was a flurry of « No comment » and a generic, undated, corporate
statement on the website. The statement can be seen at; http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/environment/emergency-preparedness/spill-prevention-and-response/valdez-oil-spill
Alternatively, the corporation can utilize their current social media
tools (twitter and YouTube) to launch a coordinated response to the accusations
that Exxon did nothing about the Exxon Valdez spill. On YouTube, they could
make a before and after video highlighting the Exxon restoration of the
coast. They can also put in place a
virtual yearbook documenting all the progress there have done on upgrading the
safety of the oil rigs since the catastrophic. By responding in an indirect way
to the accusation that Exxon is not doing anything, the company is able to
respond in an austere but effective way, while at the same keeping their brand
clean and reinforcing the message that their company is worthy of investment
and customer confidence
Conclusion
This project sought to analyze the current online presence for the Exxon Mobil cooperation,
headquarter in Irving, Texas. Through the use of various social media
analytical tools such as but not limited to Social Mention, Google Trends and
Social Baker, we have concluded that despite having physical location in over
40 different countries globally, the companies has very little desire to engage
in the virtual world. Even if these reasons are rational, continuing the
current path, especially since the competition is more virtually engaging,
is not recommended. More and more researchers demonstrate the value of engaging with the customers who sit behind the other side of the computer and instead of
receiving orders are the ones writing options, tweeting, and publishing their uncensored thoughts.
It is imperative that Exxon reshapes their attitude towards social media and
the Groundswell development. To do so, the author has put forward three
different recommendation and policy actions that would, if implemented permit a
slight rebranding of the company while controlling what is being said and
maintain a very corporate profit driven focus.
No comments:
Post a Comment